Summary

Impact of an emergency department short-stay unit on clinical management and quality of hospital care indicators

Richard Espiga F, Mòdol Deltell JM, Martín-Sánchez FJ, Fernández Sierra A, Fernández Pérez C, Juan Pastor A

Affiliation of the authors

Servicio Urgencias, Responsable de la UCE, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Spain. Servicio Urgencias, Responsable de la Unidad de Corta Estancia del Hospital Universitario Germans Trías i Pujol, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain. Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. Jefe Servicio de Codificación y Documentación Clínica, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Spain. Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain, Facultad de Enfermería. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Madrid. Spain. Director asistencial del Instituto Catalán de la Salud (ICS), Spain.

DOI

Quote

Richard Espiga F, Mòdol Deltell JM, Martín-Sánchez FJ, Fernández Sierra A, Fernández Pérez C, Juan Pastor A. Impact of an emergency department short-stay unit on clinical management and quality of hospital care indicators. Emergencias. 2017;29:147-53

Summary

Objective.

The primary aim was to study the impact that creating a short-stay unit (SSU) had on clinical management and quality of care indicators of a hospital overall and its conventional wards. The secondary aim was to establish values for those indicators and determine the level of satisfaction of patients admitted to the SSU.

Material and method. Quasi-experimental before-after study of the impact of establishing a SSU in a tertiary care teaching hospital. The first period (without the SSU) was in 2012, the second (with the SSU) was from 2013 through 2015. To meet the first objective we selected cases in 2012 in which patients were hospitalized for problems related to the 5 diagnosis-related groups most often admitted to the SSU in the second period. To meet the second objective, we studied all patients admitted to the SSU in the second period Data related to quality of care and clinical management were analyzed retrospectively. and asked them to complete a questionnaire on patient satisfaction.

Results.

A total of 76 241 admissions were included: 19 090 in the first period and 57 151 in the second (2705 admissions were to the SSU). The mean hospital stay decreased in the second period (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91–0.95); the mean stay also decreased on medical wards (IRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92–0.96) with no impact on adverse outcomes. The mean stay in the SSU was under 3 days in spite of an increase in the weighted mean (IRR,1.08; 95% CI, 1.05–1.11). A total of 320 questionnaires were received (11.8% response rate); all aspects were assessed very

highly.

Conclusions.

Our experience suggests that opening a SSU could improve clinical management and quality of care indicators for a hospital overall and for its conventional wards in the context of the GRDs that most frequently lead to admissions.

 

More articles by the authors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *