Summary

Analysis of times of emergency service transport of patients to a catheterization laboratory in the first year implementing a code of practice for attending acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Asturias

Houghton García RF, González Rancaño MM, Medina Camean AB, Peláez Fernández MC, Eiroa Vallés MT, Álvarez Ordiales R, Laca García SI

Affiliation of the authors

SAMU-Asturias, Spain.

DOI

Quote

Houghton García RF, González Rancaño MM, Medina Camean AB, Peláez Fernández MC, Eiroa Vallés MT, Álvarez Ordiales R, et al. Analysis of times of emergency service transport of patients to a catheterization laboratory in the first year implementing a code of practice for attending acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Asturias. Emergencias. 2014;26:259-66

Summary

Background and objectives: To assess the degree of compliance with time objectives

for starting a primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Asturias, Spain, and to

determine whether there are differences between patients first treated by prehospital

emergency medical services and taken directly to a catheterization laboratory and those

first taken to hospitals without laboratories.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive observational study of cases of acute ST-elevation

myocardial infarction attended by the prehospital emergency services in Asturias in

2012. Cases were classified into 2 groups: in the first were patients taken directly to the

catheterization laboratory (direct route) and in the second, patients first taken to

emergency departments in hospitals without a laboratory (indirect route). We compared

times between the onset of symptoms, first medical contact, activation of the

catheterization laboratory, and balloon inflation in the laboratory.

Results: We analyzed 359 cases (direct route, 238; indirect route, 121). The mean time

between first medical contact and balloon inflation was 88.9 minutes; 87.7% of the

patients were attended within 120 minutes or less (direct route, 93.3%; indirect route,

76.7%). Patients who sought care within 2 hours of onset of symptoms experienced a

mean delay of 87.8 minutes; 58.8% were attended within 90 minutes or less (direct

route, 70.2%; indirect route, 32.3%).

Conclusions: Time objectives are being met in Asturias. The best care scenario is for

patients to be treated at the scene by the prehospital emergency service and taken

directly to a catheterization laboratory. Efforts must be made to advise the population to

call a local emergency number (112 or 061) as soon as chest pain suggests a coronary

event. First responders should make the effort to diagnose the condition and transfer the

patient quickly to a catheterization laboratory.

 

More articles by the authors