Summary

Performance of single or paired rescuers or teams of two using a mechanical resuscitation device on manikis: a comparative cohort study

Fischer H, Stumpf D, Neuhold S, Frantal S, Rützler K, Rinösl H, Hochbrugger E, Theiler L, Greif R

Affiliation of the authors

Department of Anaesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Surgical Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. AUVA Trauma Hospital, Linz, Austria. Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University Vienna, Austria. Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland.

DOI

Quote

Fischer H, Stumpf D, Neuhold S, Frantal S, Rützler K, Rinösl H, et al. Performance of single or paired rescuers or teams of two using a mechanical resuscitation device on manikis: a comparative cohort study. Emergencias. 2013;25:278-84

Summary

Purpose: To compare the efficiency of the Animax handpowered mechanical

resuscitation device (MRD) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation during use by a single

rescuer or paired rescuers working on manikins. The basis for comparison was a new

parameter, the effective compression ratio (ECR).

Methods: This was a comparative cohort study of data from prior studies that were

entered into a spreadsheet (Excel) for analysis with a macro. The ECR, which integrates

parameters that are relevant to effective resuscitation, was compared between the 2

cohorts.

Results: Single rescuers achieved a higher mean (SD) ECR (0.57 [0.3] vs 0.32 [0.3] for

the paired rescuers, P < .001) but their ECR declined more rapidly (by 2.2% vs 1.1% per minute, P = .01) and they had less compression depth (41.8 mm [3.7] vs 46.2 mm [6.9 mm] for the paired rescuers, P < .001). The ECR decreased 0.01 (2.3%) per minute in the single-rescuer cohort and 0.004 (1.1%) per minute in the paired-rescuer cohort (P = .01). Conclusions: The Animax mechanical resuscitation device was superior when used by a single rescuer than when used by paired rescuers, based on the integrated ECR parameter. Although the decline in the ECR when the MRD was used by the single rescuers was more pronounced within the first 3 minutes, overall they achieved a higher ECR. Before this MRD is used more widely, clinical studies are needed to test the devices safety and efficacy in patients.

 

More articles by the authors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *